top of page

August 4, 2026: Budget night: a missing sidewalk, and who should run youth sports

Aug 6
3 min read

Streets, Sidewalks & Parks

Named two pieces of street the city had walked past — On the record Working through the 2027 project list, Salazar raised two specific gaps she had seen on the ground. There is no sidewalk on the south side of Castle Pines Parkway between Shoreham and Yorkshire, where landscaping went in but the walk did not, and people walk there anyway; staff confirmed it is on the list and would be built as part of the road reconstruction rather than as its own project. She also asked who is responsible for the bare concrete median coming out of Canyonside — the developer or the city — and whether it could be planted like the landscaped medians elsewhere in town. Staff believed the city has already taken ownership of that road and agreed to confirm.

Asked for evidence before the city takes over youth sports — Under study Staff proposed that Castle Pines start running its own recreation programs at Elk Ridge Park as soon as next spring — a real shift, because youth sports here are run by a private league that holds an NFL Flag affiliation, and the city owning the field means the city would get first call on it. Salazar asked for the comparison before the decision: how does city-run recreation actually perform against privately run programs on cost and on quality, and where cities do it well, what are they doing that Castle Pines could copy? She also asked what it would take in staffing, and whether it means hiring someone. Council asked staff to keep the option alive and bring back the analysis, including what it would cost residents either way.


“I would be curious if it’s possible to do some research on the difference between privately funded programmed recreation versus publicly — is it more efficient, is it more effective? And if it’s well run by cities, what are they doing well that we could replicate if we decide to go forward?”— Council Member Kori Salazar, August 4, 2026

Council Compensation

Proposed tying the council stipend to inflation, and drew an objection — On the record Salazar raised the idea of reviewing the council stipend so that it tracks the consumer price index — not a raise in real terms, she said, but a way to keep the figure from eroding, so that a decade from now whoever holds these seats is not doing the work for a payment inflation has hollowed out. She noted council members are not doing the job for the money. Council Member Mulvey objected on the spot, saying she is not in favor of increasing council salary, that indexing is an increase, and that she does not regard it as consistent with public service. Salazar answered that keeping pace with inflation is not the same as a raise. Staff noted any change requires an ordinance and that under the charter it cannot apply to sitting members: it would not take effect until after the 2027 election, and later still for members not on that ballot. Staff already had council compensation on its list of items to bring forward.

About this record

Every entry comes from a public Castle Pines City Council meeting; video and official minutes are available through the city clerk’s office. Ordinances take two council votes — an entry marked first reading still needed a second, confirming vote before it became law. Resolutions, emergency ordinances and contract awards take a single vote. Matters still in process are described as such rather than claimed as outcomes. Dollar figures come from the staff memo or the record; none are estimated.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page